Defendant's arrest photograph was properly admitted at trial since it corroborated police testimony as to the type of clothing defendant was wearing at the time of the sale, which was relevant to the accuracy of the undercover officer's description and identification of defendant ( see, People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 195-196, cert denied 396 US 1020; People v Larry, 178 AD2d 282, lv denied 79 NY2d 1003; People v Santana, 162 AD2d 191).