Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CESAR TUESCA, Respondent, v. RANDO MACHINE CORP., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant. AMERICAN WHITE CROSS LABORATORIES, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Tuesca v Rando Mach. Corp., 226 A.D.2d 157, affirmed.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 226 A.D.2d 157).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TUESCA v. RANDO MACHINE CORP
(Feb 13, 1997)