PER CURIAM.
Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D92 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 30, 1996).
MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.