AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NILLI GURVITSCH, Appellant, v. SERGIO GURVITSCH, Defendant, and SHMUEL KLEIN, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which directed Shmuel Elein to pay sanctions in the sum of $1,000 to the Lawyers Fund for Client Protection; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing in accordance herewith.

In imposing sanctions against the plaintiff's counsel, the court failed to set forth in a written decision the offending conduct, why the court found the conduct frivolous, and why the amount awarded was appropriate ( see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.2; Flaherty v Stavropoulos, 199 AD2d 301). Furthermore, the plaintiffs attorney was not afforded an opportunity to be heard on the matter of sanctions. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing and reconsideration of the issue of an appropriate sanction, if any.

We have considered the appellant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GURVITSCH v. GURVITSCH
(Feb 24, 1997)