AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MICHAEL BROWN, Respondent, v. GAYLE BROWN, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although this Court's authority is as broad as that of the trial court in custody matters ( see, Young v Young, 212 AD2d 114, 117; Matter of Rosiana C. v Pierre S., 191 AD2d 432, 433), the general rule is that custody determinations are ordinarily a matter of discretion for the hearing court, the determination of which is based upon a "firsthand assessment of the parties, their credibility, their character, and temperaments", and should be accorded great deference ( Matter of Krebsbach v Gallagher, 181 AD2d 363, 364).

Based upon our review of the record in light of the above principles, we are satisfied that the Family Court correctly determined that the best interests of the children would be served by granting the father sole custody.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BROWN
(Feb 24, 1997)