We decline to disturb the trial court's factual findings, especially given that such findings rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses ( see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495). Reliable, albeit contested, evidence supports all of the trial court's essential factual conclusions. Plaintiffs contentions represent nothing more that his own self-serving view of the evidence, which gives this Court no reason to disturb the subject judgment ( see, Antzakas v Farmland Dairies, 202 AD2d 324). We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.