AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PETER DESTEFANO et al., Respondents, v. GUTTERMANWARHEIT REALTY CORP. et al., Appellants, and MURPHY CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondents.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Gutterman-Warheit Realty Corp. is dismissed, as that defendant is not aggrieved by the order entered March 6, 1996; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Gutterman's, Inc.; and it is further,

Ordered that the Plaintiff's-respondents are awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellants.

We agree that there are factual issues as to the origin of the ice patch which allegedly caused Peter DeStefano's fall, and whether reasonable care was exercised in the maintenance of the premises in question ( see, Fisher v Big V. Supermarkets, 221 AD2d 499; Marcellus v Littauer Hosp. Assn., 145 AD2d 680, 681-682; cf., Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972; Grillo v New York City Tr. Auth., 214 AD2d 648). Accordingly, the motion of the defendant Gutterman's, Inc., was properly denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DESTEFANO v. GUTTERMAN-WARHEIT REALTY CORP
(Mar 3, 1997)