Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The order under review denied the last in a series of applications for the same relief, i.e., vacatur of a judgment entered March 3, 1986. The motion that resulted in this order was thus, in effect, one for reargument, and inasmuch as the court carefully reviewed the merits of the Plaintiff's arguments, the court, in effect, granted reargument, and then adhered to its prior determinations ( see, e.g., Purdie v Crestwood Lake Hgts. Section 4 Corp., 229 AD2d 523; Tobjy v Tobjy, 181 AD2d 822).
The Supreme Court did not err in its disposition of the Plaintiff's latest motion. The interest on the 1986 judgment, which accords with the judgment dated March 21, 1985, properly runs from April 11, 1985. The Plaintiff's remaining arguments are equally meritless.