AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLIFTON A. PHILLIPS, Appellant.

Memorandum:

During the suppression hearing, defendant twice requested that County Court conduct a Barden inquiry because the arresting officers had no information establishing probable cause other than that provided by an informer ( see, People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177, rearg denied 34 NY2d 995). Because there is "insufficient evidence to establish probable cause apart from the testimony of the arresting officer as to communications received from [the] informer" ( People v Darden, supra, at 181), the court erred in denying defendant's request for a Darden hearing ( see, People v Adrion, 82 NY2d 628, 633-634). Thus, we hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Onondaga County Court to conduct a Darden hearing. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PHILLIPS
(Mar 14, 1997)