AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

MICHAEL KELKENBERG, Appellant, v. JOHN T. ANDERSON et al., Respondents.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff asserted that the parties entered into a joint venture regarding the purchase of lottery tickets and that he is entitled to share in the $10 million lottery jackpot won by defendants on April 8, 1995. Defendants established that the parties never intended to form a joint venture and plaintiff did not contribute any money to the lottery pot for the purchase of the April 8, 1995 lottery tickets. Plaintiff's assertions that employees reimbursed one another for contributions to the lottery pot from time to time does not controvert the fact that plaintiff did not participate in the relevant pool and does not raise a question of fact regarding the existence of a joint venture ( see, Village of Wellsville v Village of Andover, 231 AD2d 870). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KELKENBERG v. ANDERSON
(Mar 14, 1997)