Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents-appellants are awarded one bill of costs.
The supervision of discovery, as well as the setting of reasonable terms therefor, rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Its determination will not be disturbed absent a showing that it improvidently exercised that discretion ( see, Matter of U.S. Pioneer Elec. Corp. [Nikko Elec. Corp.], 47 NY2d 914; Cardiomax, Inc. v Gustafson, 227 AD2d 812; Kaplan v Herbstein, 175 AD2d 200). Under the particular facts of this case, the Plaintiff's failed to show that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion by directing the plaintiff Carline Lennon, the mother of the infant plaintiff, to supply authorizations for non-privileged academic and employment records, as well as by directing her to submit to an intelligence quotient or IQ test which, as the Plaintiff's have conceded, does not constitute privileged medical information.