AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER, INC., et al., Appellants, v. CATHY CARRON et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

The IAS Court correctly found that Plaintiffs' patient list, left unprotected on a centralized computer accessible to all persons in the medical suite sharing or using the computer, did not qualify as a trade secret ( see, Ashland Mgt. v Janien, 82 NY2d 395, 407; Defiance Button Mach. Co. v C C Metal Prods. Corp., 759 F2d 1053, 1063, cert denied 474 US 844). Nor does the complaint contain an allegation that third-party defendants actually breached their contract with Plaintiff's, necessary to any cause of action for tortious interference with contract (see, Inselman Co. v FNB Fin. Co., 41 NY2d 1078, 1080). As the IAS Court noted, the complaint alleges only that the subject contract had to be "renegotiated" because of defendants' alleged interference. We have considered Plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER, INC. v. CARRON
(Mar 25, 1997)