AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Smart Summary

Case Summary: In the Matter of Robert G. ALLISON, Debtor (Bankruptcy No. BK96-41820)

Factual and Procedural Background

The debtor filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and claimed a Nebraska homestead exemption under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 40-101 for a residence valued at $8,805.00. First National Bank ("First National"), an unsecured creditor, objected to the debtor's homestead exemption. The debtor is disabled and receives Social Security disability and Medicaid. He lives in the residence with his adult daughter, Alenna, and her son Daniel (age 6). Alenna receives food stamps and aid to dependent children, has less than a high school education, was laid off from a short-term job about forty miles away, lacks dependable transportation, and cares for her father and son. The bankruptcy court issued this memorandum and order denying First National's objection.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the debtor qualifies as a "head of family" under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 40-115, permitting the homestead exemption.
  2. Whether Neb. Rev. Stat. § 40-115 confers head-of-family status when the person cared for is an adult child who reached majority before residing with the claimant, or when the claimant cares for a minor grandchild.

Arguments of the Parties

First National's Arguments

  • The debtor does not qualify as a head of family because his daughter did not reside with him until after she reached the age of majority and there is evidence she can support herself.
  • Section 40-115 does not confer head-of-family status on a person who cares for a minor grandchild residing in the home.

Debtor's Arguments

  • The debtor claims head-of-family status under § 40-115(5) because his adult daughter resides with him and is unable to care for or support herself.
  • Alternatively, the debtor urges a broad construction of § 40-115 to include one who provides care and maintenance for a grandchild residing in the home.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Landon v. Pettijohn, 231 Neb. 837, 843, 438 N.W.2d 757, 761 (1989) The homestead law should be liberally construed in favor of those for whose benefit it was enacted. The court relied on the principle of liberal construction to interpret the Nebraska homestead statutes in favor of protecting the family unit and claimants who qualify as a head of family.
Horn v. Gates, 155 Neb. 667, 671, 53 N.W.2d 84, 86 (1952) Cited as supporting authority for liberal construction of homestead law. Used as part of the chain of authority endorsing liberal construction in favor of those protected by the statute.
First Nat. Bank of Tekamah v. McClanahan, 83 Neb. 706, 120 N.W. 185 (1909) Cited in earlier jurisprudence referenced for the nature and protection of the homestead exemption. Identified as antecedent authority in the line of cases the court cited to justify liberal construction in favor of family-protective homestead interpretation.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court examined the Nebraska Homestead statute (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 40-101) and the definition of "head of a family" in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 40-115. Noting the Nebraska Supreme Court's instruction that homestead laws be liberally construed for beneficiaries, the court framed the issue as whether the debtor qualified as a head of family under § 40-115. The court addressed First National's contention that the daughter reached majority before residing with the debtor and that she could support herself; and the alternative contention that § 40-115 does not extend head-of-family status for care of a grandchild.

Applying the statutory definition § 40-115(5), the court evaluated the factual record: the daughter's temporary employment forty miles away ended after a few months; she could not regain employment because of lack of a local job market, lack of dependable transportation, and the need to remain at home to care for her father and son; she is a single mother with a son who has severe allergies and has less than a high school education. On this factual basis the court found the daughter "unable to support herself." Accordingly, the court concluded the debtor meets § 40-115(5)'s requirement that an adult relative residing with and under the claimant's care and maintenance be unable to support himself or herself, and thus the debtor is a head of family entitled to the homestead exemption.

Holding and Implications

Disposition: The court ordered that First National's objection to the debtor's claim of exemption is denied.

Implications: As a direct result, the debtor may claim the family home as exempt under the Nebraska Homestead Exemption. The opinion applies statutory interpretation and existing state precedent to the facts but does not announce or discuss the creation of a new legal precedent beyond its application to these facts.

In the Matter of Robert G. ALLISON, Debtor.

MEMORANDUM

JOHN C. MINAHAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

In this case the First National Bank ("First National") has objected to debtor's claim of a homestead exemption under Nebraska law. The objection is denied.

FACTS

The debtor's bankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs, claim a homestead exemption under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 40-101 with respect to a home with a market value of $8,805.00. The debtor is disabled and receives social security disability benefits and Medicaid. He suffers from alcoholism and back spasms. The debtor lives in the home with his adult daughter, Alenna. She receives food stamps and aid to dependent children. Alenna's son, Daniel Allison, who is 6 years of age and suffers from severe allergies, also resides in the home. In a broad sense, the debtor, his adult daughter, Alenna, and her child, Daniel, are an extended family who have pooled their family resources to survive and to live in a home valued at only $8,805.00. First National seeks to deprive them of the benefit of the homestead exemption and to liquidate the home for the benefit of creditors. First National holds an unsecured claim in this bankruptcy case.

LAW

The Nebraska Homestead Exemption is statutory and provides as follows:

A homestead not exceeding ten thousand dollars in value shall consist of the dwelling house in which the claimant resides, its appurtenances, and the land on which the same is situated, not exceeding one hundred and sixty acres of land, to be selected by the owner, and not in any incorporated city or village, or, at the option of the claimant, a quantity of contiguous land not exceeding two lots within any incorporated city or village, and shall be exempt from judgment liens and from execution or forced sale, except as provided in sections 40-101 to 40-116.

Neb.Rev.Stat. § 40-101.

The Nebraska Homestead is available to a head of family which is defined as follows:

The phrase head of a family, as used in sections 40-101 to 40-116, includes within its meanings every person who has residing on the premises with him or her and under his or her care and maintenance:
(1) His or her minor child or the minor child of his or her deceased wife or husband;
(2) A minor brother or sister or the minor child of a deceased brother or sister;
(3) A father, mother, grandfather, or grandmother;
(4) The father, mother, grandfather, or grandmother of a deceased husband or wife;
(5) An unmarried sister, brother, or any other of the relatives mentioned in this section who have attained the age of majority and are unable to take care of or support themselves; or
(6) A surviving spouse who resides in property which would have qualified for a homestead exemption if the deceased spouse were still alive and married to the surviving spouse.

Neb.Rev.Stat. § 40-115.

The Nebraska Supreme Court has stated, "[T]he homestead law should be liberally construed in favor of those for whose benefit it was enacted." Landon v. Pettijohn, 231 Neb. 837, 843, 438 N.W.2d 757, 761 (1989), citing Horn v. Gates, 155 Neb. 667, 671, 53 N.W.2d 84, 86 (1952), which in turn was citing First Nat. Bank of Tekamah v. McClanahan, 83 Neb. 706, 120 N.W. 185 (1909).

The Nebraska Homestead Exemption has long been viewed as protecting the family unit and is available only to a head of family. The issue in this case is whether the debtor qualifies as a head of family. First National asserts that the debtor does not qualify as head of family because his daughter did not reside in the home until after she reached the age of majority and there is evidence that she can support herself. In addition, First National argues that § 40-115 does not bestow head of family status upon one who cares for a minor grandchild residing in the home.

The debtor argues that his home qualifies as a homestead because he is a head of family as defined in Neb.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 40-115. The debtor admits that he did not occupy the home with his daughter until after she reached the age of majority. However, he claims that under § 40-115(5), he is a head of family because he cares for his daughter who is unable to care for or support herself. In the alternative, the debtor argues that § 40-115 should be broadly construed to include within the definition of head of family, one who is providing care and maintenance for a grandchild residing in the home.

I conclude that the debtor qualifies as head of family under § 40-115(5) because his adult daughter resides with him and she is not able to support herself. Although Alenna worked for a period of time as a cashier at a place of employment some forty miles from the homestead, she was laid off from her job after only a few months. Alenna has not been able to regain employment because of lack of a local job market, lack of dependable transportation, and the fact that she needs to stay at home and care for her father and son. The debtor's daughter is a single mother with a son who has severe allergies. She has less than a high school education. There is no local job market in which she can gain employment. The nearest place for her to obtain employment is nearly forty miles away and she has no dependable means of transportation. For these reasons, I find that she is unable to support herself and that her father, the debtor herein, qualifies as a head of family under § 40-115(5). Accordingly, the debtor may claim the family's home as exempt under the Nebraska Homestead Exemption.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that First National's Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemption (Fil.# 8) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ALLISON, (Bankr.D.Neb. 1997)
(Apr 11, 1997)