Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MCCLOSKY, APPELLANT, v. REGAL MINING, INC.; ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES. [THE STATE EX REL.] TARR

The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 95-2635 is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d 1175.

The complaint in mandamus in case No. 96-304 is dismissed because relator has an adequate legal remedy from the Industrial Commission's order by way of appeal to the court of common pleas. R.C. 4123.512; Afrates v. Lorain.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MCCLOSKY v. REGAL MINING, INC
(Apr 16, 1997)