AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

PATRICK SMITH et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and MRLS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. J.D.W. CONSTRUCTION CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), entered October 25, 1995, upon the third-party defendant's default in complying with a prior order of the same court dated March 9, 1995, granting the third-party plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment unless the third-party defendant responded to certain discovery, which is in favor of the defendant and third-party plaintiff and against it.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court entered a judgment in favor of the third-party plaintiff and against the appellant after the appellant failed to comply with a prior order granting the third-party plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its third-party complaint unless the appellant provided certain discovery. Since the judgment is deemed to have been entered on the appellant's default, the appellant's proper remedy was to move to vacate the judgment rather than a direct appeal ( see, CPLR 5511; Murphy v. Murphy, 212 A.D.2d 583; see, e.g., Fleet Fin. v. Nielsen, 234 A.D.2d 728; Rust v. Sifer, 115 Misc.2d 363). Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Apr 28, 1997)