Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSE A. RANGEL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jose A. Rangel alleges that, during his plea and sentencing hearing on July 15, 1996, for a probation revocation, the trial court erroneously calculated his sentencing guidelines scoresheet.

Appellant's failure to expressly reserve his right to appeal a sentencing issue either at the plea/sentencing hearing or by way of a motion to correct sentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), waives appellate review. Additionally, no fundamental error appears. See Amendments to The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 685 So.2d 773, 775 (Fla. 1996); § 925.051(3) (4), Fla. Stat. (1996); Middleton v. State, 22 Fla. Law Weekly D259 (Fla. Jan. 27, 1997).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J., GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RANGEL v. STATE
(Apr 25, 1997)