Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the first degree in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment and various other unrelated charges, with the express understanding that he would be sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 9 years. On this appeal, defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in refusing to adjudicate him a youthful offender or, alternatively, that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. Although there is a question of whether defendant served as a lookout during the crime or was actually present in the apartment at the time of the burglary, it is undisputed that during the course of the burglary two of the victims were assaulted with handguns. Due to the violent and serious nature of the crime, we find that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status ( see, People v. Chapman, 227 A.D.2d 665, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 934; People v Ferrari, 202 A.D.2d 872). Also, given defendant's past criminal history and the fact that defendant received the benefit of his plea bargain, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court ( see, People v. Davis, 232 A.D.2d 678, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 921).
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.