STATE v. WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSP. CORP

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 95-0070

Attorney(S)

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Thomas L. Dosch, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs Susan K. Ullman, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendants-third party plaintiffs-appellants there was a brief by Jon P. Axelrod, Joseph A. Ranney and DeWitt Ross Stevens, S.C., Madison and Janet Gilbert, general counsel and Wisconsin Central Ltd. And Fox Valley Western Ltd., Rosemont, IL and oral argument by Jon P. Axelrod. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Patrick J. Nugent, and Canadian Pacific Legal Services, Minneapolis, MN for the Sool Line Railroad Company. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Patrick K. Stevens and WI Manufacturer and Commerce, Madison and Richard M. Esenberg and Foley Lardner, Milwaukee for the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Marilyn Townsend, Madison for the United Transportation Union.

Judges

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 95-0070

Attorney(S)

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Thomas L. Dosch, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs Susan K. Ullman, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendants-third party plaintiffs-appellants there was a brief by Jon P. Axelrod, Joseph A. Ranney and DeWitt Ross Stevens, S.C., Madison and Janet Gilbert, general counsel and Wisconsin Central Ltd. And Fox Valley Western Ltd., Rosemont, IL and oral argument by Jon P. Axelrod. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Patrick J. Nugent, and Canadian Pacific Legal Services, Minneapolis, MN for the Sool Line Railroad Company. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Patrick K. Stevens and WI Manufacturer and Commerce, Madison and Richard M. Esenberg and Foley Lardner, Milwaukee for the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Marilyn Townsend, Madison for the United Transportation Union.

Judges

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Defendant. WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., AND FOX VALLEY WESTERN LTD., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of

the court of appeals. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz, Justice Jon P. Wilcox and Justice Janine P. Geske would affirm; Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice William A. Bablitch withdrew from participation.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Defendant. WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., AND FOX VALLEY WESTERN LTD., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Comments