AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK SNELL, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the determination of the hearing court that the defendant's statement was taken prior to his attorney's entrance into the case. When reviewing a determination of a hearing court, its findings of fact and determinations of credibility must be accorded great deference, as that court had the opportunity to view the witnesses during their testimony ( People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759; People v. Hardy, 226 A.D.2d 652). The hearing court credited the interrogating detective's testimony that the defendant's statement was taken prior to his attorney's entrance into the proceedings, and we decline to disturb that finding ( see, People v. Slater, 173 A.D.2d 1024; see also, People v. Singletary, 135 A.D.2d 757). Therefore, the defendant's waiver of his right to counsel without counsel being present, was effective, and denial of the motion to suppress the statement was proper.

Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SNELL
(May 5, 1997)