Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In sentencing the defendant, the County Court properly considered the defendant's statement made to a State Investigator even though the statement had been suppressed as evidence obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436; see, People v. Williams, 164 A.D.2d 1, 6, mod 79 N.Y.2d 281, 288; People v. Estenson, 101 A.D.2d 687; People v. Wright, 104 Misc.2d 911, 920-926).
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.