Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no basis for disturbing the hearing court's decision to credit the arresting officer's testimony that he initially approached the defendant because of his resemblance to an individual portrayed in a police department wanted poster ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). The officer had, at the very least, the right to approach the defendant to request information ( see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181; People v Jacob, 202 A.D.2d 444). The defendant's resemblance to a suspect in a homicide, his nervous behavior, and his act in reaching to his stomach justified the officer's decision to remove the defendant's hands from his stomach and pat the stomach area ( see, People v. Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267, 271; People v. Taveras, 207 A.D.2d 306; People v. Rodriguez, 177 A.D.2d 521). The weapon in the defendant's waistband was therefore properly seized, and there is no basis to suppress the defendant's spontaneous statements to the police.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.