Petitioner was employed as a senior court officer and was scheduled to work a shift from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. As a result of two separate incidents, petitioner applied for accidental disability retirement benefits. Petitioner seeks review of respondent Comptroller's determination denying her application on the ground that it is not supported by substantial evidence.
The first incident occurred on November 1, 1988 when, shortly before 9:00 A.M., upon entering the foyer of the courthouse on her way to report for work, petitioner slipped and fell on water and wet leaves, sustaining injuries. Inasmuch as petitioner had not yet reported for work, substantial evidence supports the determination that she was not "in service" at the time that the injuries occurred (see, Matter of Farley v. Regan, 162 A.D.2d 905; Matter of Cantello v. Regan, 154 A.D.2d 867).
The second incident occurred on March 11, 1993. According to petitioner, the elevator in which she and a fellow officer were riding made a sudden jolt and dropped to the basement, causing her to strike the interior of the elevator and sustain injuries. Other witnesses, however, offered conflicting descriptions of the event and stated that petitioner did not sustain any injury as a result of the minor malfunction of the elevator. It is well settled that it is within the discretion of the Comptroller to evaluate and resolve issues of credibility (see, Matter of Farruggio v. McCall, 222 A.D.2d 925, 926). Here, the Comptroller credited the testimony of the witnesses who had no motivation to fabricate the events. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Comptroller's finding that petitioner did not sustain injuries as a result of the elevator incident. Because substantial evidence supports the determination regarding both incidents, it is, accordingly, confirmed.
Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.