AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROGHIEGH AZIZ et al., Respondents, v. VILLAGE OF GREAT NECK PLAZA, Respondent, MIDNECK REALTY CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As the plaintiffs' cause of action against the Village of Great Neck Plaza (hereinafter the Village) was properly dismissed on the ground that the Village never received actual, prior, written notice of the alleged defect in the sidewalk which caused the injuries to the plaintiff Roghiegh Aziz (see, Village Law § 6-628), the defendant Midneck Realty Corp. (hereinafter Midneck) may not properly seek contribution from the Village (see, Barry v. Niagara Frontier Tr. Sys., 35 N.Y.2d 629; O'Rourke v Town of Smithtown, 129 A.D.2d 570; Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447). The Supreme Court therefore correctly severed the plaintiffs' action against Midneck, and dismissed Midneck's cross claims against the Village (see also, Boscolo v County of Nassau, 229 A.D.2d 457; Fitzrandolph v. Rodrigue, 205 A.D.2d 496; Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay, 201 A.D.2d 553).

Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AZIZ v. VILLAGE OF GREAT NECK PLAZA
(May 19, 1997)