Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in summarily denying defendant's pro se suppression motion made more than 45 days after defendant's arraignment (see, CPL 265.20[1], [3]; 710.40 [1], [2]; see, e.g., People v. Jones, 114 A.D.2d 974, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 6Z3). We further conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147; People v. Trait, 139 A.D.2d 937, 938, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 867). Finally, defendant's sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.)