Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his guilty plea was not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made. Defendant entered his plea in the presence of counsel after County Court fully apprised him of the consequences of the plea (see, People v. Alexander, 185 A.D.2d 712, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 926; People v. O'Keefe, 170 A.D.2d 1020, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 965). The conclusory allegation of defendant that the court, the prosecutor and defense counsel coerced him into pleading guilty is not supported by the record. Further, in light of the unsupported and conclusory allegations of defendant that he was coerced into pleading guilty, the court properly denied his CPL 440.10 motion without a hearing (see, People v. Smith, 227 A.D.2d 987, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 995; People v. Mills, 194 A.D.2d 1016, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 899). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Reckless Endangerment, 1st Degree.)