Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ex parte Walter J. PRICE, Jr. (Re Martha Jo MAHAFFEY, indi v. dually and as executrix of the estate of Martha Jo Sanders, deceased

KENNEDY, Justice.

Walter J. Price, Jr., seeks a writ of mandamus compelling Judge Joseph Battle of the Circuit Court of Madison County to vacate his order of March 25, 1997, denying Price's request for a stay of civil proceedings against him pending the resolution of criminal investigations into his activities regarding the administration of estates. We deny the writ.

This matter arises out of legal work that Price, formerly an attorney in private practice, had performed for Martha Jo Mahaffey, the executrix of the estate of Martha Jo Sanders, deceased. Mahaffey sued Price, alleging legal malpractice related to advice he had given her with respect to the estate.

Price is the target of ongoing criminal investigations related to his handling of estate moneys. He argues that if discovery proceeds in Mahaffey's civil action he will have to elect between exercising his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself, and fully defending himself against Mahaffey's civil claims.

For a discussion of this privilege in the context of postponements in civil actions, see Ex parte White, 551 So.2d 923 (Ala. 1989), and Ex parte Coastal Training Institute, 583 So.2d 979 (Ala. 1991).

For the writ of mandamus to issue, the petitioner must show, among other things, "a clear legal right . . . to the order sought." Ex parte Bloodsaw, 648 So.2d 553, 554 (Ala. 1994). Nothing before us indicates that Mahaffey's malpractice case — which is premised solely on an allegation of bad advice — could pose any potential for incriminating Price. Accordingly, Price has not shown a "clear legal right . . . to the order sought."

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON, COOK, and SEE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE PRICE
(Jun 13, 1997)