Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a judgment upon the defendant's default in answering upon the condition that the defendant serve an affidavit of a meritorious defense, since the defendant offered a reasonable excuse for her delay in ultimately serving an answer (see, Silberstein v. Presbyterian Hosp., 96 A.D.2d 1096). The record clearly reflects that both parties had entered into an oral stipulation to extend the defendant's time to answer, and that the defendant relied upon such stipulation (see, Volin v. City Beach Catering Corp., 166 A.D.2d 583; La Marque v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 120 A.D.2d 572). The record is inconclusive as to whether there was an agreed-upon due date, and the defendant's brief delay in answering the plaintiff's ultimate request was neither intentional nor serious enough to prejudice the plaintiff's prosecution of his lawsuit (CPLR 2005; Harris v. Triangle Aviation Servs., 110 A.D.2d 882, 884).
Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.