Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is
Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that Point III of the brief of the respondent Gerald Linnane, and the bill from the law firm of Longo Cheng, dated December 5, 1995, contained in the appendix of the respondent Gerald Linnane, are stricken, and those portions of that respondent's brief and appendix have not been considered on the appeal; and it is further,
Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied.
We note that this Court may take judicial notice of matters of public record, including judicial decisions ( see, Matter of Chasalow v. Board of Assessors, 176 A.D.2d 800; Brandes Meat Corp. v. Cromer, 146 A.D.2d 666; Cohan v. Misthopoulos, 118 A.D.2d 530).
Joy, J.P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.