Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The record established that the identification procedure, using a book of photographs, was not suggestive.
Defendant's claim concerning preservation of the original photograph page viewed by the complainant is unpreserved and without merit, since production of the photographs was not essential to a determination of suggestiveness under the circumstances.
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.