Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's claim that the court violated CPL 310.20 (2) when it submitted a verdict sheet that contained seven notes instructing the jury on the order in which the charges should be considered. The notes involved herein were simply "direction[s] regarding the order in which the submitted charges should be considered" ( People v. Cole, 85 N.Y.2d 990, 991-992). Such directions are proper ( see, People v Simpson, 222 A.D.2d 462; People v. Albornoz-Sinisterra, 220 A.D.2d 600; People v. Daughtry, 202 A.D.2d 686).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.