Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that reversible error occurred because irrelevant and prejudicial evidence was admitted was not preserved for appellate review and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.06 [2]; People v. Jackson, 226 A.D.2d 476; People v. Williams, 197 A.D.2d 722; People v. Perez, 194 A.D.2d 812; People v. Brown, 188 A.D.2d 540; People v. Davis, 187 A.D.2d 725; People v. Lopez, 185 A.D.2d 189, 191).
O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.