AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ARNOLD I. KLUGMAN, Respondent, v. LLOYD KING, JR., et al., Respondents, and ROBERT A. MORABITO et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the Westchester County Board of Elections is directed to place the names of Robert A. Morabito and Phillip A. Werbel on the appropriate ballots.

We reject the petitioner's contention that the fraudulent activities attributable to two people soliciting signatures for the candidates are sufficient to show, as a matter of law, that the entire designating petition is permeated with fraud ( see, Matter of Ferraro v. McNab, 60 N.Y.2d 601, 603; Matter of Meeks v. Pruitt, 185 A.D.2d 961; Matter of Mega v. Biondo, 104 A.D.2d 472), especially where, as here, the Supreme Court found, and we agree, that the candidates neither personally participated in, nor knew about, the fraud ( see, Matter of Ferraro v. McNab, supra; Matter of Quinones v. Bass, 45 N.Y.2d 811, 813; Matter of Cilmi v. Suffolk County Bd. of Elections, 220 A.D.2d 587; Matter of Lefkowitz v. Cohen, 262 App. Div. 452, affd 286 N.Y. 499, 501; Matter of Meeks v. Pruitt, supra; cf., Matter of Miller v. Gumbs, 207 A.D.2d 612; Matter of Villafane v. Caban, 104 A.D.2d 579, 580).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KLUGMAN v. KING
(Aug 20, 1997)