CYBOR CORPORATION, v. FAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 96-1286, 96-1287

Attorney(S)

Tod L. Gamlen, Baker McKenzie, of Palo Alto, California, for plaintiff-
With him on the brief was David I. Roche, of Chicago,
Douglas A. Cawley, Hughes Luce, L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, for defendants/cross-
Of counsel was Aubrey Nick

Acts

Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Organization Of Courts — Assignment Of Judges; Panels; Hearings; Quorum

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 96-1286, 96-1287

Attorney(S)

Tod L. Gamlen, Baker McKenzie, of Palo Alto, California, for plaintiff-
With him on the brief was David I. Roche, of Chicago,
Douglas A. Cawley, Hughes Luce, L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, for defendants/cross-
Of counsel was Aubrey Nick

Acts

Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Organization Of Courts — Assignment Of Judges; Panels; Hearings; Quorum

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CYBOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and FASTAR LTD., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

ORDER

The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Fed.R.App.P. 35(a), IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided in banc. Additional briefing and argument will not be required.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CYBOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and FASTAR LTD., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

Comments