Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. GARY G. BUCK, Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of burglary in the second degree, in violation of section 569.130, RSMo 1994, and one count of stealing, in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to two consecutive ten-year sentences.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and reinstating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BUCK
(Sep 23, 1997)