The court also properly granted that part of the cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. The numerous sections of the Industrial Code alleged to have been violated either do not apply to the facts of this case ( see, Klien v. County of Monroe, supra) or set forth general standards of care, which do not give rise to liability under section 241 (6) ( see, Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494, 505).