AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of VICTOR LOPEZ, Appellant, v. QUEEN LACE CORPORATION et al., Respondents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Claimant sustained a compensable back injury in March 1975. His case was closed in August 1978 following a finding of permanent partial disability and the payment of a lump-sum nonschedule adjustment in the amount of $8,000. The case was subsequently reopened based upon the representation of claimant's treating physician that there had been a change in claimant's medical condition involving, among other symptoms, an exacerbation of his back and neck pain. The Workers' Compensation Board ruled, however, that there had been no showing of a change in claimant's condition that was "not contemplated at the time of the adjustment" (Workers' Compensation Law § 15 [5-b]), with the result that claimant's case was closed. We affirm. Substantial evidence, including the negative results of an MRI test performed upon claimant's back together with the testimony of the physician who examined claimant on behalf of the Board, supports the ruling that claimant's medical condition had not worsened in an unanticipated manner warranting the award of additional benefits ( see generally, Matter of Cordell v. City of Oneida Youth Div., 146 A.D.2d 362).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LOPEZ v. QUEEN LACE CORPORATION
(Oct 9, 1997)