Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.G., P.G., C.G. AND B.G., PLAINTIFF, JUVENILE OFFICER, RESPONDENT, v. R.G. (NATURAL FATHER), C.G. (NATURAL MOTHER), APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants C.G. and R.G. appeal the trial court's order terminating their parental rights to their four children. They claim that the trial court did not have clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support its judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G
(Oct 14, 1997)