Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH WOLFERSBERGER, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF POINTPLEASANT BEACH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 305 N.J. Super. 446, 702 A.2d 1294 (1996).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOLFERSBERGER v. BOROUGH OF PT. PLEASANT BEACH
(Oct 22, 1997)