Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was prejudiced as a result of the court's jury instructions on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to the charge as delivered, or to request supplemental instructions ( see, People v. Riley, 200 A.D.2d 692; People v. Noor, 177 A.D.2d 517). In any event, the court's charge, viewed in its entirety, adequately conveyed the appropriate standard to the jury ( see, People v. Wesley, 76 N.Y.2d 555; People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96; People v. Ball, 222 A.D.2d 598; People v. Davis, 218 A.D.2d 748).
Copertino, J.P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.