AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOHN PURIFICATI, Appellant, v. MEYER DIESENHOUSE et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. ANTHONY TOOTS LABELLA, Third-Party Defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

For the defendants in a legal malpractice case to succeed on a motion for summary judgment, they must present evidence in admissible form establishing that the plaintiff is unable to prove one of the three essential elements of a malpractice cause of action ( see, Greene v. Payne, Wood Littlejohn, 197 A.D.2d 664; see also, Platt v. Portnoy, 220 A.D.2d 652; Andrews Beverage Distrib. v. Stern, 215 A.D.2d 706; L.I.C. Commercial Corp. v Rosenthal, 202 A.D.2d 644). Here, the respondents made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff could not prove that but for any negligence he would have prevailed in the underlying action, and the plaintiff failed to submit any admissible evidence to the contrary. Thus, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants.

O'Brien, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PURIFICATI v. MEYER DIESENHOUSE
(Oct 27, 1997)