The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to vacate the judgment made on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. According due deference to the hearing court's determinations of fact and credibility, we find that trial counsel's opening statement was based on his anticipation that defendant would testify and counsel's comments regarding defendant's prior "conflict with the law" constituted a reasonable effort to minimize the possible prejudicial impact of such evidence ( People v. Redor, 161 A.D.2d 736, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 863). In these circumstances, trial counsel's comments in summation regarding defendant's failure to testify constituted sound trial tactics ( see, People v. Abbott, 178 A.D.2d 281, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 918). A review of the record as a whole demonstrates that defendant received effective assistance of counsel at trial ( People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli, Williams and Colabella, JJ.