AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EMELINA MEJER-KONDLA, APPELLANT, vs. DOUGLAS CENTRE, INC. AND EAGLETON KATHE PROPERTY CO., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appellees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theolces v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEJER-KONDLA v. DOUGLAS CENTRE, INC
(Nov 12, 1997)