AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL TOMBACK, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745, 746; People v. Sutherland, 166 A.D.2d 732). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the jury's verdict was not repugnant as a matter of law since a verdict was rendered only as to one count ( see, People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 6). In addition, the defense of justification is inapplicable to the crime of criminal possession of a weapon ( see, People v. Pons, 68 N.Y.2d 264; People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126; People v. Cosby, 200 A.D.2d 682, 683).

Santucci, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TOMBACK
(Nov 24, 1997)