Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLIAMS.

Per Curiam.

In 1993, we indefinitely suspended respondent who, diagnosed as suffering from gender dysphoria, explained that the theft from the law firm was for the purpose of obtaining funds to complete a sex change by phalloplastic surgery, a very expensive procedure. Respondent attributed the criminal conduct at that time to psychological turmoil caused by the inability to complete the sex change and low self-esteem as a husband and provider.

Respondent now offers the same reasons in mitigation for the theft from Omega Tours in 1995. As Disciplinary Counsel noted to the panel, respondent was given a second chance in 1991 and before completing the probation period again committed virtually the same crime for the same reasons. Respondent has clearly violated the Disciplinary Rules as charged in the complaint. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLIAMS
(Dec 31, 1997)