Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated June 2, 1997, as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated June 2, 1997, as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for renewal is dismissed as academic; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated January 10, 1997, is reversed, on the law, and the defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
As the parties moving for summary judgment, the defendants were required to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the underlying accident (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955; Flanagan v. Hoeg, 212 A.D.2d 756). Neither the report prepared by the plaintiff's physician nor the other evidence submitted by the defendants established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Sabella v. McKain, 239 A.D.2d 333; Mendola v. Demetres, 212 A.D.2d 515).
Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.