By failing to object, or by making a generalized objection and seeking no further relief after the court provided a curative instruction, defendant failed to preserve his claim that testimony about radio runs constituted impermissible hearsay and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review defendant's claim, we would find it without merit since the testimony completed the narrative and provided relevant background information explaining police actions (see, People v. Li, 238 A.D.2d 277; People v. Rivera, 223 A.D.2d 476, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 852).
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli JJ.