AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of PHILIPSTOWN INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., Respondent, v. TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the Town Board's denial of the petitioner's application for a temporary special use permit was arbitrary and capricious and not supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Twin County Recycling Corp. v. Yevoli, 90 N.Y.2d 1000; Matter of Framike Realty Corp. v. Hinck, 220 A.D.2d 501). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly determined that former Town of Philipstown Code § 175-42 et seq. was preempted by the Mined Land Reclamation Law (ECL-23-2701 et seq.), as the former sections of the Town of Philipstown Code directly regulated mining operations ( see, ECL 23-2703; Philipstown Indus. Park v. Town Bd., 247 A.D.2d 525 [decided herewith]).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF PHILIPSTOWN INDUS. P. v. TOWN BOARD
(Feb 17, 1998)