Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeals from the orders declaring the petitioner to be the father of the subject children must be dismissed as no appeal lies from an order entered on the consent of the appealing party ( see, Baecher v. Baecher, 95 A.D.2d 841). An order entered on consent is not appealable because a party who consents to an order is not aggrieved thereby ( see, Matter of Hartnett v. Hartnett, 242 A.D.2d 535; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. [Tabitha McC.], 202 A.D.2d 502; Goodman v. Goodman, 150 A.D.2d 636).
The appeal from the order dated March 3, 1995, must be dismissed as academic because that order expired by its own terms on December 31, 1995 ( see, Matter of Richard S., 242 A.D.2d 575; WJF Realty Corp. v. Town of Southampton, 240 A.D.2d 657).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.