AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CLAIRE BORENSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The Supreme Court improperly denied the plaintiffs' motion for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (a) (4). The injured plaintiff's husband, who is over 70 years of age, possesses a recognizable cause of action. Therefore, under CPLR 3403 (a) (4), the plaintiffs are automatically entitled to a special trial preference (see, Milton Point Realty Co. v. Haas, 91 A.D.2d 678; Bobowski v. Toomey, 108 Misc.2d 1061; cf., Longo v. Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 100 Misc.2d 606).

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BORENSTEIN v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Mar 9, 1998)