The six-year Statute of Limitations for claims for fraudulent conveyance is not applicable to and, accordingly, should not have been invoked to preclude proof relevant to, that aspect of plaintiff petitioner's "suit in aid of execution to discover assets for the purpose of producing satisfaction" for a judgment (see, Altman v. Finkel, 268 App. Div. 666, 671-672, affd 295 N.Y. 651). A suit in aid of execution is a separate cause of action brought pursuant to CPLR 5227, not the Debtor and Creditor Law, and we note that, in distinction to causes for fraudulent conveyance arising under the Debtor and Creditor Law, a CPLR 5227 cause of action does not and indeed cannot accrue until judgment is entered against the debtor.
We have considered plaintiff's additional arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rubin and Tom, JJ.